Crypto 101: Decoding Cryptocurrency Forks: Impact And Types

In the world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, the concept of forking signifies a divergent shift or a modification in the existing protocol of a blockchain network. Forks can either be "soft forks" or "hard forks", each having its unique implications and effects on the blockchain ecosystem.

Soft Forks: An Amicable Upgrade

A soft fork is an upgrade to the blockchain protocol that is backwards compatible. When a blockchain undergoes a soft fork, the nodes operating under the updated rules can still recognize and validate blocks created by nodes that operate under the old rules. However, nodes that haven't upgraded to the new rules won't be able to validate blocks created under these new rules.

Essentially, a soft fork represents a minor change, where upgraded nodes continue to communicate with non-upgraded ones, fostering a sense of inclusivity and unity within the network.

One of the most notable examples of a soft fork in the history of Bitcoin was the implementation of Segregated Witness (SegWit) in 2017. SegWit was proposed as a solution to the scalability issue that Bitcoin was facing, by changing the way data was stored in blocks. This soft fork was backward-compatible, meaning that non-upgraded nodes could still participate in the Bitcoin network and validate transactions. It did not result in a new cryptocurrency, but instead upgraded the existing Bitcoin protocol.

Hard Forks: A Decisive Split

On the other hand, a hard fork is a radical change to the blockchain protocol that isn't backwards compatible. After a hard fork, all network nodes must adhere to the new rules to validate new transactions. If some nodes stick with the old rules while others adopt the new ones, two separate blockchains can form.

Hard forks can often be contentious and stem from disagreements within the community. This was the case when Bitcoin Cash forked from Bitcoin in 2017 due to disagreements on the way to handle scalability issues. Some in the Bitcoin community wanted to increase block size from 1 to 8 megabytes for higher transaction capacity. Others opposed this, fearing it could lead to greater centralization and favored solutions like SegWit and the Lightning Network. As different nodes enforced different rules, the network split, creating two separate cryptocurrencies.

Another significant fork occurred with Ethereum in 2016, following the infamous DAO hack. This resulted in a split into Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC). The hard fork was implemented to refund the money lost in the hack, a move that was deemed controversial by part of the community who decided to stick with the original chain, Ethereum Classic.

Accidental Forks: An Unintended Consequence

Accidental forks can occur in a decentralized network like a blockchain due to inconsistencies between various nodes. Such inconsistencies might stem from different node versions running on the network or a sudden disconnection in the network that causes a temporary split.

In an accidental fork, two miners may solve the proof-of-work algorithm simultaneously, leading to the creation of two valid blocks. Each miner will then broadcast their newly found block to the network. Some nodes may accept one block first, while others may accept the other. This scenario leads to a temporary split in the network, with two versions of the truth running in parallel.

Accidental forks are typically resolved when the next block is mined. Nodes always follow the longest chain rule, which states that given the choice between two chains, the one with the most accumulated proof-of-work (i.e., the longest chain) will be accepted. Thus, the chain that gets the next block becomes the longest and is adopted by the entire network, effectively eliminating the shorter chain.

Accidental forks are generally not a cause for concern, as they are a natural part of the blockchain's functioning and are quickly resolved by the system itself. However, it's crucial that all network participants use the latest software version to minimize the occurrence of accidental forks.

Forks Vs Cloning: A Case Of Mistaken Identity

In the context of cryptocurrencies, it's easy to mix up the concepts of "forking" and "cloning", but there are distinct differences between the two.

Cloning involves creating a new cryptocurrency by duplicating the open-source code of an existing one. Cloning doesn't affect the original blockchain or its operations; it merely uses the initial codebase as a starting point for a completely new cryptocurrency. The cloned cryptocurrency then operates independently and is controlled and maintained by its own community. To put it simply, a clone creates a new, separate entity, while a fork induces changes within the same entity.

The practice of cloning in the world of cryptocurrency is quite common due to the open-source nature of most blockchain projects. Some popular examples include:

Litecoin (LTC): Arguably the most successful clone, Litecoin was created by Charlie Lee in 2011 by cloning Bitcoin's code and making several modifications. Litecoin offers a faster block generation time and uses a different hashing algorithm (Scrypt instead of SHA-256).
Dogecoin (DOGE): Originally created as a meme, Dogecoin was cloned from Litecoin in 2013. Dogecoin's key differentiation is its unlimited supply and less serious approach to cryptocurrency, which has since cultivated a large and passionate community.
Monero (XMR): Monero is a privacy-focused cryptocurrency that was cloned from Bytecoin, an early privacy coin. Monero has since introduced several key improvements to increase privacy and security.

The Impact Of Forks On The Cryptocurrency Landscape

Forks have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency landscape. They can lead to the birth of new cryptocurrencies, as was the case with Bitcoin Cash and Ethereum Classic. Forks also reflect diverse opinions and visions within the community, leading to increased innovation and evolution in the blockchain space.

However, they can also create uncertainty and instability. For instance, the announcement of a hard fork can lead to wild price fluctuations as investors try to predict the outcome. Moreover, if the fork is contentious, it can cause rifts within the community, as seen with the Bitcoin-Bitcoin Cash split.

Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Twitter.