IRS's Cryptocurrency Data Collection Proposal Sparks Controversy

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is considering a significant step in data collection from cryptocurrency users, igniting debates regarding privacy and financial surveillance. This move comes as the cryptocurrency industry keenly observes the IRS's interpretation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

Background Of The Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act

In 2021, the primary focus of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was infrastructure development, such as road and bridge constructions. Cryptocurrency was not the core concern. However, when urgent funding became necessary, Congress introduced two provisions to enhance financial monitoring of cryptocurrency users. The underlying argument was that stricter surveillance would boost tax revenue, indirectly suggesting tax evasion by cryptocurrency users.

Initially, the Joint Committee on Taxation projected these provisions would generate approximately $28 billion in tax revenue over a decade. However, this estimate was significantly reduced in the Biden administration's subsequent budget, suggesting only a $2 billion collection over the same period. This adjusted figure, based on an evolving market, further questions the initial estimate's accuracy.

The IRS Proposal And Its Implications

Although the IRS's proposal might not be as drastic as some feared, it suggests a concerning trajectory regarding mandatory customer reporting. The proposal seems to pivot on whether a service provider has the "potential" to know customer details, rather than whether they usually possess such information. For instance, some decentralized exchanges and self-managed wallets, even if they typically don't gather extensive user data, might be compelled to disclose customer information based on their capability to do so. This perspective essentially promotes a "collect by default" approach.

This proposition aligns with the U.S. government's consistent expansion of financial reporting obligations through legislations like the Bank Secrecy Act and the Patriot Act. Both the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act's provisions and the IRS's subsequent proposal are continuations of this broadening framework.

The Need For A Shift In Perspective

In a nation where the Fourth Amendment defends citizens' rights, default reporting of customers to authorities is questionable. Ordinary transactions, such as cryptocurrency payments, receiving money from online sales, or salary payouts, should not automatically enlist individuals into governmental databases.

A departure from the current surveillance-driven approach might necessitate foundational changes in U.S. legislation. However, public sentiment seems supportive of such a change. According to a Cato Institute survey, 79% of Americans find bank data sharing with the government unreasonable, and 83% believe a warrant should be mandatory for accessing financial details.

In moving forward, while the imminent deadline for feedback on the IRS's proposal looms, stakeholders should consider both the explicit and implicit implications of the proposal.

The Role Of Congress

Although the IRS's actions are under scrutiny, it's essential to remember that the onus of amending the existing scenario and the overarching framework of financial surveillance primarily rests with Congress. After all, the IRS is merely executing Congress's directives. Hence, comprehensive system reform requires congressional intervention.

Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Twitter.