Microsoft Challenges NYT's AI Copyright Lawsuit

Microsoft defends ChatGPT's innovation in court, rejecting NYT's copyright infringement claims.

What's the dispute between Microsoft and The New York Times about?

Microsoft has countered The New York Times' copyright lawsuit with accusations of alarmism, invoking the term "doomsday futurology" to critique the newspaper's claims that ChatGPT poses a existential threat to the news industry. In a Manhattan court filing, Microsoft draws parallels between The Times' stance and historical resistance to technological innovations like the VCR, asserting that the evolution of AI, specifically through OpenAI's ChatGPT, represents a transformative leap rather than a dire threat to copyright integrity.

OpenAI Challenges New York Times Copyright Lawsuit
OpenAI disputes The New York Times’ copyright lawsuit, challenging claims of ChatGPT’s infringement.

In its legal defense, Microsoft rebuffs The Times' allegations of copyright infringement through the use of large language models like ChatGPT. The tech giant emphasizes that such AI technologies, which have been trained on vast data including copyrighted material, do not directly compete with or replace the original works. This argument mirrors past technological disputes, where new tools from copy machines to the internet faced similar legal scrutiny over copyright use, highlighting a recurring theme of balancing copyright protection with innovation.

The Real-World Usage Of ChatGPT

Microsoft's defense also challenges The Times' portrayal of how ChatGPT is used, suggesting that the scenarios cited in the lawsuit are not reflective of typical user interactions with the AI. By labeling these instances as "unrealistic prompts," Microsoft aims to dispel the notion that ChatGPT's functionalities inherently lead to widespread copyright infringement, focusing instead on the legitimate and transformative applications of AI in accessing and generating information.

OpenAI's Position And The Future Of News Consumption

OpenAI, for its part, has dismissed claims of significant copyright infringement, arguing that the instances of verbatim text generation were the result of ChatGPT's unintended memorization rather than a deliberate design to replicate copyrighted content. This defense seeks to separate the capabilities and intentions of AI development from the allegations of creating a direct substitute for traditional news sources, such as a subscription to The New York Times.

OpenAI and journalism
We support journalism, partner with news organizations, and believe The New York Times lawsuit is without merit.

As the legal battle unfolds, the industry watches closely, with Microsoft and OpenAI challenging the premise that their AI advancements undermine copyright laws. The dispute raises critical questions about the intersection of AI technology with traditional content creation and copyright, setting the stage for a broader discussion on the future of information dissemination and consumption in the digital age.

In light of Microsoft's and OpenAI's formidable partnership and the stakes involved, including a potential profit share of up to 49% for Microsoft, the outcome of this lawsuit may well influence the trajectory of AI development and its integration into the fabric of daily digital interactions, from news consumption to personal and professional communication.


Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on X/Twitter.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to REX Wire.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.