Ripple Vs SEC: A Turning Point For Crypto Regulations

Battle of the Titans: The Ripple vs. SEC case could mark a turning point for the crypto industry.

Education banner: Library with globe

Ripple Labs, a prominent blockchain developer and the entity behind the XRP token, which powers some of its functionality, is currently engaged in a pivotal legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Southern District Court of New York. The case centers around whether XRP is to be considered a security or a commodity. Ripple argues for the latter, leaning on past remarks from an SEC director, while the SEC claims that Ripple's $1.3 billion fundraising effort in 2013 was an unregistered security offering.

Ripple's Soaring Ambitions Meet Regulatory Hurdles

Ripple's aspirations to revolutionize global transactions with its lightning-fast network were put to the test when SEC leveled its allegations in December 2020. As a result, major trading platforms, including Coinbase, halted XRP transactions, casting a shadow over Ripple's previously bright market prospects.

The Core Of The SEC's Accusations

In their case against Ripple and two of its high-ranking executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen, the SEC alleges that they sold more than $1.3 billion in unregistered securities. The SEC claims Ripple avoided necessary registration, leaving a concerning lack of transparency.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse (Photo: Kyle Grillot | Bloomberg | Getty Images)

The Case's Wider Implications: A Regulatory Reset for Cryptos?

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, in September 2022, declared many cryptocurrencies to be securities. A bill proposed by US Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand followed this statement, pushing to label most cryptocurrencies as commodities, ushering in a potential reshuffling of crypto's regulatory landscape.

The Ripple Case: Where Does It Stand Now?

Ripple has remained staunch in its defense, maintaining that the SEC's case lacks a substantial basis. Ripple's general counsel, Stuart Alderoty, claimed on Twitter that the SEC failed to apply the Howey Test—an established tool used to ascertain if an asset is a security—correctly.

The Howey Test: A Crucial Determinant

The Howey Test, derived from the US Supreme Court case SEC v. Howey, is used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an "investment contract", and therefore, a security. The test checks for an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits expected to be derived from the efforts of others. | Framework for “Investment Contract” Analysis of Digital Assets

XRP As A Security: A Critical Unresolved Issue

At the heart of this debate lies the question: Should investing in XRP (either at its token sale or on the secondary market) be viewed as a contract wherein profits arise from the efforts of others? With ongoing investigations into several token launches by the SEC, a decision against Ripple could trigger a domino effect.

The verdict of the Ripple lawsuit may redraw the boundaries for cryptocurrency regulations. A defeat for Ripple might instigate a chain reaction of stricter regulations and fines against a multitude of crypto initiatives, marking a major turning point in the industry's trajectory. Conversely, a win would prove a cause for optimism from several other organizations currently fighting lawsuits against the SEC.

Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on Twitter.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to REX Wire.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.