UK's Stance On Crypto ETFs Raises Questions

The UK remains cautious on crypto ETFs, unlike the US and Europe, citing regulatory concerns.

Why hasn't the UK approved crypto ETFs?

While the US, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and Canada have embraced retail access to cryptocurrency exchange traded products (ETPs), the UK stands out for its restrictive stance. Despite Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's support for establishing the UK as a crypto hub, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has not approved retail access to such products, citing concerns over high-risk derivatives.

The FCA's Regulatory Concerns

In 2021, the FCA banned the sale of cryptocurrency-related derivatives, including ETPs, to UK retail investors, motivated by the risks associated with leveraged products. This broad ban also encompassed unleveraged products, creating a dichotomy where UK investors can directly purchase digital tokens but are barred from regulated crypto ETPs. The European market, contrastingly, hosts 120 crypto ETPs with €8.4 billion in assets, demonstrating a regulated pathway for crypto investments.

The UK’s Love/Hate History With Crypto
New regulation may end UK banks’ mean streak against crypto companies.

Market Demand Versus Regulatory Hesitation

Despite a clear market demand for regulated crypto investment vehicles, as evidenced by platforms like InvestEngine and HANetf, the FCA's ban remains a significant barrier. Industry experts argue that the current regulatory framework inadvertently pushes investors towards less regulated, riskier exchanges. The recent surge in crypto ETPs in the US, involving major firms like BlackRock and Invesco, signals a shift towards mainstream acceptance that the UK regulator may need to reconsider.

The Path Forward For UK Crypto Investments

While there's a consensus on the need for some regulatory gating for complex products, the outright ban on crypto ETPs is seen as counterproductive. Critics argue that a more nuanced approach, allowing informed investors to partake in crypto ETPs under certain conditions, could mitigate risks without stifling investment opportunities. However, the FCA's concerns regarding market integrity and volatility suggest that any change in stance would require compelling evidence of market evolution since the ban's introduction.


Subscribe to our newsletter and follow us on X/Twitter.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to REX Wire.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.